The majority of studios (of any size) don’t have a need for PCI expansion. Limitations on RAM and SSD size? 128GB and 8TB is too limited? Those upgrades are hella expensive, no doubt, but does anybody in pro audio need that much RAM? Also, I have too many samples and they only take up 5TB.Ĥ. Pro audio professionals have little interest in GPU comparisons.ģ. Single core performance is effectively identical for all M1 variants, so for tracking with native plugins, it has no special advantage.Ģ. The answer is… 20 cores is overkill for most, except those who rely heavily on virtual instruments. Nowhere do you really address the question in the title, the M1 Ultra chip’s specific suitability for pro audio work. So many are likely to wait for the new Mac Pro.ġ. Without upgradability, it simply isn’t a sustainable and future-proof tool. For professional studios looking to upgrade to an Apple silicon workstation, the Mac Studio just isn’t what we’ve been waiting for. Like so much tech aimed at the content creation market, it offers Swiss-Army knife solutions to a very impressionable audience. Once you take a look at the reviews and benchmarks, you’re faced with the truth. The initial hype wave of the Mac Studio washed over us all, with impressive promises of performance. Does the Mac Studio make sense for home producers? Meanwhile, the built-in webcam is also subpar in the quality department, but at least Apple has promised to fix this with a software update. On top of that, the selection of stands is factory configured and cannot be altered after the fact – which sucks, frankly. The six-speaker system did not give you a particularly accurate image of Apple’s Spatial Audio format. Apart from the astronomical price tag, there were several aspects that simply didn’t cut it. The new Studio Display received mostly mixed reviews, while some were unconvinced, to say the least.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |